|
4 points
|
Contains complete response with clear, coherent, and unambiguous explanation; includes clear and simple diagram, if appropriate; communicates effectively to identified audience; shows understanding of question's mathematical ideas and processes; identifies all important elements of question; includes examples and counter examples; gives strong supporting arguments |
|
3 points |
Contains good solid response with some, but not all, of the characteristics above; explains less completely; may include minor error of execution but not of understanding |
|
2 points |
Contains complete response, but explanation is muddled; presents incomplete arguments; includes diagrams that are inappropriate or unclear, or fails to provide a diagram when it would be appropriate; indicates some understanding of mathematical ideas, but in an unclear way; shows clear evidence of understanding some important ideas while also making one or more fundamental, specific errors |
|
1 point |
Omits parts of question and response; has major errors; uses inappropriate strategies |
|
0 points |
No response; frivolous or irrelevant response |
From "Contemporary Mathematics in Context" , 1997
October, 2000